[MIRS-IR Vol III:2; 3/4/99]
Introduction
Recently, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty
(PTA) has become an accepted technique for treating arterial stenosis of
supra-aortic vessels. Angioplasty of the supra-aortic vessels was avoided for
some time because of the risk of embolization to the central nervous system.
Theron et al. have recently advocated carotid angioplasty with the adjunctive
use of cerebral protection and additional use of stents, where indicated, for
all types of carotid artery stenosis. However, the use of cerebral protection
remains a controversial subject. Anderson et al suggest that stent implantation
should be an option to treat sub-optimal or unsuccessful PTA results. However,
most recently interventional radiologists and cardiologists have utilized
primary stenting of carotid stenoses to decrease the initial risk of
embolization from atherosclerotic plaque or dissection after PTA .
Background
The three major etiologies of carotid stenosis are
atherosclerotic disease, post-endarterectomy stenosis and inflammatory stenosis.
Atherosclerotic stenosis most often involves the carotid bifurcation and less
commonly the innominate artery, proximal common carotid and carotid siphon. In
the post-endarterectomy patients, where endarterectomy was performed for
atherosclerotic disease, recurrent stenosis at the carotid bifurcation may occur
6 months to 2 years following the surgical procedure. Post-endarterectomy
stenosis is highly amenable to endovascular treatments such as PTA with or
without stenting. The most common causes of inflammatory stenosis are radiation
therapy, fibromuscular dysplasia and Takayasu arteritis. In most cases,
angioplasty is performed initially, using cerebral protection where indicated,
and stents are used when there is unsatisfactory results or if there is a
dissection.
Case Presentation
A 58 year- old male who had undergone left
carotid endarterectomy several years prior presented with a three-month history
of blurred vision. The patient had a carotid arteriogram performed at an outside
facility which demonstrated >90% restenosis at the origin of the left ICA
Technique
Using a right common femoral approach, a diagnostic
angiogram confirmed the left ICA stenosis of >90%. Due to the severity of the
lesion and because it was composed of post-endarterectomy scar tissue, it was
elected to stent primarily without attempting initial angioplasty. The lesion
was crossed using a 0.035 Glidewire and angle-tip catheter. The Glidewire was
exchanged for a Rosen wire. The patient was given an IV bolus of 3,000 units of
heparin. After performing appropriate measurements to size the native vessel, an
8 mm x 2 cm WallStent (Boston Scientific Vascular) was placed across the
stenosis
Outcome
The post-operative course was uneventful and the patient
was discharged home the next day. He is currently taking Ticlopidine and ASA and
continues to do well with no recurrent symptoms.
Discussion
Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis that reduces the
diameter of the vessel by 70% or more carries a significantly higher incidence
of stroke if treated medically (up to 26%) compared to surgical treatment. PTA
of the cervical segment of the common and internal carotid arteries (ICA) is an
alternative to vascular surgery in the treatment of symptomatic carotid artery
disease. The potential benefits of PTA of the carotid artery are shortened
hospital stay, reduced procedure time and avoidance of general anesthesia.
Additionally, there should be a reduction of morbidity and mortality, which is
as high as 5-6% following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic patients.
Indications for PTA and/or carotid stent placement are similar to the indications for carotid endarterectomy. Prior to angioplasty, all patients should have hemodynamically significant stenosis (>70%) by Doppler ultrasound (US) and have this confirmed by angiography in at least two projections. Additionally, clinical symptoms such as transient ischemic attacks and previous stroke with moderate residual deficits should be taken into account. Rarely, endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis is performed as an emergency during intra-arterial thrombolysis for ischemic stroke.
PTA is a well accepted technique for treating occlusive diseases in almost
all anatomic territories. PTA of the carotid arteries is commonly complicated by
significant elastic recoil. Suboptimal results also due to dissection or
persistent irregularity of the vessel wall that could serve as a nidus for
thrombosis. Additionally, manipulation of guide wires, catheters and balloons,
and plaque rupture associated with angioplasty have the potential to give rise
to peri-procedural cerebral embolization. Theron et al have described a triple
coaxial catheter technique of protected angioplasty
Stent placement may be performed primarily on high-grade stenoses, or it may be used to complement PTA when angioplasty results are compromised by highly resistant lesions, elastic recoil, dissection or other sub-optimal results. Re-operation after CEA carries a higher complication rate than the original surgery and the lesions are primarily fibrotic, making these patients logical candidates for stent deployment. If used if conjunction with PTA, carotid stents can improve the results of angioplasty in two ways. First, stents protect the arterial wall thereby reducing the risk of dissection, and secondly stents have been shown to reduces the incidence of re-stenosis. Theron et al found that, before stents were accepted for use in the carotid arteries, approximately 5% of carotid PTA resulted in dissection. After they began using stents for unsatisfactory angioplasty results, the residual intimal flap rate dropped to 0%. These investigators also noted a reduction in re-stenosis from 16% to 4% with the adjunctive use of stents. Carotid stenting is has a 12-month primary patency rate of approximately 90%. However, the lack of long-term follow-up data on patency and delayed complications remains a significant obstacle to the widespread use of carotid stents at this time. Improvements in technique and a more aggressive antiplatelet regimen with Ticlopidine may have a positive impact on reducing neurologic complications.
Despite its potential advantages, PTA and stenting of the ICA remains in the early stages of development. The results of the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS) may prove that PTA or stenting is a safe and effective initial treatment of carotid stenoses. Until then, this treatment should be reserved for patients with specific indications, such as surgically inaccessible lesions, re-stenoses after CEA, significant concomitant medical disease, and fibromuscular dysplasia.
|
References | |
|
1. |
Theron J et al. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Treatment with Protected Balloon Angioplasty and Stent Placement. Radiology 1996; 201: 627-636. |
|
2. |
Anderson P.E. et al. Carotid artery stenting. Journal of Interventional Radiology 1998 Volume 13 Number 3; 71-76. |
|
Top | Contents |