[MIRS-IR Vol II:5; 8/20/98]
Introduction
Central venous catheters are used extensively for
chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, and long term antibiotics. A potential
complication with the use of central venous catheters is fracture or breakage of
the catheter with the intravascular fragment migrating centrally as a foreign
body embolus. It has been variously estimated that this complication occurs with
a frequency of approximately
There are several endovascular techniques available for retrieving
intravascular foreign bodies including endovascular forceps and retrieval
baskets similar to those used in the biliary system and urinary tract. However,
the most commonly used devise for intravascular catheter fragment retrieval is
an endovascular snare introduced via a catheter as originally described by
This report describes a case where a twelve-centimeter long catheter fragment impacted within the left pulmonary artery was initially freed using a pigtail catheter and subsequently removed through the right femoral vein using a snare technique.
Case Presentation
The patient is a 41-year-old female with
breast cancer and an indwelling right subclavian Infuse-A-Port catheter which
had been in place approximately one year. Apart from a weekly flushing with
normal saline the catheter had been unused since completion of her last course
of chemotherapy three months previously. A routine chest radiograph revealed a
twelve-centimeter long fragment of the distal central venous catheter had broken
off and become lodged within the left pulmonary artery with the fragment
straddling the left upper and lower pulmonary arteries
The patient was referred to our service for intravascular retrieval of the catheter fragment as it represented a potential nidus for thrombus formation or infection. There was also concern that the fragment would cause a significant pulmonary infarct if clot formed around it or if the fragment migrated more distally.
Procedure
The patient's right femoral vein was percutaneously
accessed using a micropuncture technique. An 8 Fr 80 centimeter length braided
sheath (Arrow) was then advanced into the right atrium over a guide
wire. A 100 centimeter long 5 Fr Glidecath (Medi-tech) and Bentson guide
wire (Cook) were introduced through the sheath and manipulated through
the right heart into the left main pulmonary artery. The sheath was then
advanced over the Glidecath into the left main pulmonary artery. The Glidecath
was then exchanged for a 10 mm Amplatz snare (Microvena). Attempts to
snare the inferior aspect of the catheter fragment within the descending left
pulmonary artery were unsuccessful as the tip of the catheter fragment was
impacted in the vessel
The snare with the secured catheter fragment was withdrawn through the
tricuspid valve, right atrium, and into the IVC. At this point the snare and
captured catheter fragment were advanced into the right subclavian vein and the
snare repositioned near the middle of the catheter. This was done in case the
captured catheter fragment should break during manipulation and removal.
Positioning the snare in the middle reduced the risk of a new fracture producing
an embolic fragment too small to recapture. The snare and captured catheter
fragment were then withdrawn into the right femoral vein. A Bentson wire was
placed in side-by-side fashion through the sheath and passed into the IVC as a
safety wire
Discussion
Several minimally invasive endovascular retrieval
techniques can be used to recover intravascular fragments from fractured or
broken central venous catheters. The most commonly used technique involves using
an intravascular snare to capture and secure the catheter fragment. The snare
has the advantage of being able to secure the captured fragment tightly enough
that it can be removed through the percutaneous access site without the need of
a cut-down. However, a disadvantage of the snare is that at least one end of the
catheter must be free and accessible to the snare loop. This case required the
initial use of a pigtail catheter to manipulate the fragment into a favorable
position that facilitated subsequent capture and removal. Since the captured
fragment is doubled over in the snare, its cross section is often larger than
the internal diameter of the vascular sheath. Consequently, it is frequently
necessary to remove the catheter fragment and sheath as a unit. However, such
fragments may be quite brittle and subject to additional breakage when tension
is applied to the snare. Therefore, it is generally advisable to place a safety
wire to secure access in the event of fragmentation and embolization during
removal.
|
References | |
|
1. |
Castaneda-Zuniga, Interventional Radiology, Williams and Wilikins,1977. |
|
2. |
Curry J.L., Recovery of Detached Intravascular Catheter or Guidewire Fragment: A Proposed Method, AJR, 1969; 105:894-896. |
|
Top | Contents |